The answer to this question may surprise you. In fact, according to a recent British Medical Journal article discussing this issue, few health professionals, including doctors, dieticians, and personal trainers know the correct answer.
First, let’s back up for a minute.
When you consume calories beyond what your body needs, you will end up storing that extra energy in the form of triglycerides (glycerol backbone plus 3 free fatty acids) within fat droplets of individual fat cells, or adipocytes. Importantly, whatever the macronutrient composition of your diet (carbohydrate vs. protein vs. fat), when “calories in” exceed “calories out”, the end result is more triglycerides stored in your fat cells. (Before the carbohydrates or protein you ingested end up filling up a fat cell in the form of triglyceride, they undergo a chemical conversion.) In other words, you could plump up your fat cells by eating only salad (it would take a lot of salad, of course).
When attempting to lose fat mass, you increase energy output or lower energy input such that the body dips into its energy storage within fat cells to keep itself going. (Of course, the body may also break down some muscle for energy, but for simplicity we’ll ignore that variable here). At the cellular level, this works out to liberating the triglycerides from adipocytes through lipolysis (literally, fat breaking), yielding 4 separate products from each stored triglyceride: 1 glycerol and 3 free fatty acids. As a fat cell liberates more and more triglycerides during times of negative caloric balance, it becomes smaller and smaller, but never quite disappearing. The products of lipolysis can then be oxidized, or “burned” as fuel to produce energy.
The whole process can be VERY BROADLY summarized in the following chemical equation:
Triglyceride (C55H104O6) + 78O2→ 55CO2 + 52H2O + energy
So yes, as you may have guessed at the outset, when oxidized, fat is used to create energy.
However, what the formula also reveals is that 1 triglyceride molecule (with the help of oxygen) is converted to a bunch of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O). In fact, according to the recent article on the topic, when somebody loses 10 kg of fat (triglyceride), 8.4 kg is exhaled as CO2 while the remaining 1.6 kg is lost as water in urine, feces, sweat, tears and other bodily fluids.
So, for the most part, the answer to the question that started this discussion is as follows:
When fat is lost, it is mostly exhaled as carbon dioxide (84%), with the remainder (16%) being excreted as water. Interestingly, this also means that the lungs are the primary excretory organ for fat.
[Peter – PLOS Blogs Network | Reproduced here under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence; Image via FatLossKeys]
I like this perspective, very new..i have never thought about this. 🙂
LikeLike
Interesting. I just heard a radio program about studies showing that, contrary to popular belief, it isn’t aerobic exercise like cardio (“fat-burning”) that’s the most efficient means of losing fat around the stomach but strength training. That suits me because I hate cardio!
LikeLike
Excellent article!
LikeLike
This is really cool. Great information!
LikeLike
Fascinating 🙂
LikeLike
Hey, nice blog you have! Of course it’s always nice with sources for articles like this.
Thank you for stopping by my blog and liking my post, much appreciated!
Hope to see you again visiting my blog!
LikeLike
From one science geek to another, this is great information! Thanks for the follow and the likes on my posts too.
LikeLike
Read about Low Carb High Fat Nutrition turn around in Sweden
LikeLike
You should check out the video on http://youtube.com/scilabus – they made a great video explaining just this 🙂
LikeLike
Can you explain the most effective way to get rid of the fat? Thx
LikeLike
Ew! Stop breathing fat on me! ;>)
LikeLike
Interest article from the British Medical Journal. Thanks for sharing the link.
LikeLike
So, when we lose weight we are increasing our carbon footprint by exhaling more CO2? Doesn’t that mean that we should all stay fat?
LikeLike
I had the same thought about carbon. I suppose you could just plant a few trees to offset it! 😉
LikeLike